Dominik Kellovsky vs Michael Geerts Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

When it comes to second serve performance over the recent months, how do Kellovsky and Geerts stack up? Kellovsky has managed to win 45.43% of points on his second serve, closely matched by Geerts at 46.67%. This statistic is crucial in the realm of match predictions, offering a glimpse into their resilience during play.

Moving on to return game stats, which player has shown more prowess? Kellovsky has claimed 44.71% of his opponents' second serve points, with Geerts slightly ahead at 45.25%. For first serve returns, however, Kellovsky leads, winning 26.46% compared to Geerts' 24.53%. This crucial information could very well be the key to favoring one player over the other in their head-to-head matchups.

Under pressure, each player's ability to save breakpoints can influence the game's outcome significantly. Kellovsky has saved 50% of the breakpoints against him, while Geerts boasts a higher rate at 52.45%, offering a strategic edge for in-game betting predictions.

In the grand scheme of match results over the past year, Kellovsky has been triumphant in 63.24% of his encounters (43 wins, 25 losses), slightly surpassing Geerts, who has a win rate of 59.77% (52 wins, 35 losses). This data lends itself to an overall head-to-head prediction with Kellovsky demonstrating a slight edge.

Analyzing their best surfaces, Kellovsky performs optimally on hard courts, winning 58% of his matches, whereas Geerts shines with a 62% success rate on the same surface. However, Geerts struggles on grass, having not secured a win, while Kellovsky's weakness appears on clay at a 53% win rate.

The level of tournaments played cannot be ignored. Kellovsky has mostly competed in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments at the $10K level, coming out victorious in 67.27% of his matches. Geerts, meanwhile, has tackled the challenging arena of Challengers/ITF events above $10K, with a 50.94% win rate. Recognizing their event level participation can significantly shift in predicting who might have the upper hand.

Diving into their direct head-to-head encounters, both players have squared off twice, splitting their victories evenly with a set count of 3-2 in Geerts' favor. Their last bout concluded with Kellovsky's triumph at the USA F31 in Norman back in November 2018. Notably, in matches that have gone the distance, Kellovsky has been more successful, winning all deciding sets they faced against each other.

In pressure-packed scenarios, they've yet to engage in any tiebreaks, leaving a blank slate on who might emerge victorious in such moments. When facing opponents of similar caliber, both have competed against players with nearly identical average ranks, making this match a compelling encounter.

If the match ventures into a decisive set, recent performance suggests Kellovsky might have a better chance, as he boasts a 60% success rate in such scenarios over the last year, compared to Geerts’ 48%. This insight can be invaluable for live predictions and betting. As the current event progresses, keeping an eye on who finds their form could tilt the scales.

In terms of converting breakpoints, Kellovsky proves more effective, converting 37.39% of his break opportunities, whereas Geerts achieves 34.57%. This factor can prove decisive when predicting the victor of closely contested games. Based on these compelling statistics, Kellovsky seems poised to have a slight edge over Geerts, positioning him as the predicted winner in this matchup.